Sajjan Kumar, sentenced for life term.
Congress leader Sajjan Kumar has been been sentenced to life in jail for his role in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots by the Delhi High Court. The court today cancelled an earlier court order acquitting him. He, was convicted in the killing of five members of a family in Raj Nagar in Delhi.
He can not leave the city and has to surrender by December 31.
“It is important to assure the victims that despite the challenges truth will prevail,” the High Court said, referring to the courage of Jagdish Kaur, the victim who had fought for action against Sajjan Kumar and others. “The aftershock of those atrocities is still being felt,” said the court. While many witnesses and survivors gave accounts of Congress leaders leading mobs targeting Sikhs, Sajjan Kumar is the first top leader of the party to be convicted.
At least 3,000 people were killed by mobs after the assassination in November, 1984, of then prime minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards.
“Criminals have enjoyed political patronage,” the court noted, also saying there was “abject police failure” as the police failed to act against the inability of the victims to file complaints.
The CBI had also filed an appeal against Sajjan Kumar’s acquittal, alleging that the mobs were engaged in “a planned communal riot” and “religious cleansing”.
Nirlep Kaur, who saw her father being burnt alive by the mobs, wept as she thanked the law for justice after 34 years.
Amit Shah said in his tweet “Victims of 1984 riots had lost all hope of justice because those responsible for crime against them enjoyed political patronage of Congress leadership. Delhi High Court’s conviction of Sajjan Kumar has once again assured the victims that criminals of 1984 will not go scot free”
Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, said he welcomed the verdict and “it has been a very long and painful wait for innocent victims who were murdered by those in power”. He said: “Nobody involved in any riot should be allowed to escape no matter how powerful the individual maybe.”